Quantcast

SocentVC

Where Social Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Meet

Super Bowl Commercial Fail

February 9th, 2010 · View Comments · Personal, tech

During Sunday’s big game, the commercials were (as usual) a big focus of the night. Thankfully, the game itself wasn’t overshadowed by the commercials or by old dudes playing during halftime. Nonetheless, there were a few memorable moments from the night away from the gridiron.  There was the controversial showing of the Tim Tebow commercial, which had been talked about ad nauseum in the media. There was the highly-anticipated Google commercial, although as soon as I saw the opening 2 seconds, I knew that I had already seen the same clip on one of Google’s YouTube channels several months back. For me personally, there wasn’t anything too noteworthy about the Super Bowl commercials this year, to be honest.

In fact, the most noteworthy thing was that CBS seemed to have been unable to sell all of its commercial slots. Especially towards the end of the game, I noticed that every other commercial was for CBS’ own shows, like NCIS and CSI and whatever other acronymed series the network has. My hypothesis about a possible cause? Social media. Seems like even the big corporations with the cash on hand to buy multimillion-dollar 30-second spots have begun to realize that social media marketing may have a greater impact on market share and “mind share” than even commercials during the most-watched television broadcast ever.

Case in point: While Coca-Cola still bought their standard slots for the Super Bowl, Pepsi decided to skip its Super Bowl commercials for the first time in 23 years, and instead invest the money in social media-related marketing. Comments from Larry Woodward, president and CEO of ad agency Vigilante, were likely similar to Pepsi’s reasoning:

“As television viewership has gone down, Internet usage, particularly social media interaction, has increased… in the important 18-34 demographic, a whopping 85 percent use social media (texting, blogging or social networking), and the phenomenal growth of social media has the attention of every major company.”

If CBS cannot even fill up advertising slots for an event has always drawn more than 80 million viewers for ~20 years, then a shift in corporate thinking about marketing really has begun!

Source: Picture from the San Francisco Chronicle.

Bookmark and Share

Tags: ·········

  • maria
    How did you not like Google's commercial?!?!? It was SOOO good!
  • Fair point, Aaron. I don't think anybody is doubting the effectiveness of traditional advertising at all. And for sure, there have never been as many eyeballs on a primetime broadcast as the 106.5 million for Super Bowl XLIV. However, I think the idea is that ROI is higher for social media than for a commercial. Perhaps Coke will benefit from its Super Bowl expenditures, but at what opportunity cost, in terms of foregone social media presence?

    Here's another Google parody, aptly titled "Parisian Oops."
    http://www.ucbcomedy.com/videos/play/5743
  • aaron
    lol @ the vid.

    Agreed presence in social media is huge - but from a personal experience standpoint, there's something about soft drink video commercials during a sports event (and beer commercials, for that matter) that just kind of works for me, psychologically...

    The other question is, did Coke really forgo its social media presence? I get that Pepsi is first mover here, but given how deep both these companies' pockets are and how much free cash flow they generate each year, I really feel Pepsi could have put some money into Super Bowl advertising and not diluted its overall Ad-ROI by much. Someone also made the point that Pepsi could've used the Super Bowl spots to promote its social media campaign, which I think would've been a good way of integrating across channels.
  • Integration across both mediums is definitely a good thought.

    And the "appropriateness" of drink commercials with the Super Bowl (as well as those with "manly man" themes) is undoubtable. I have to concur with you on that one.

    I guess not all companies have that natural fit, though, and maybe they are they comprise the remainder of the unfilled slots from Sunday. Would be interesting to take a look at historical trends of Super Bowl commercials ever since they really became a phenomenon. When did that happen, by the way?
  • aaron
    not sure this was the right move by pepsi... when else are you going to capture that many eyeballs in one sitting? maybe on a cost/viewer metric it doesn't make sense vs. social media, but i must say, my consumption of coke has gone from 0.01 cans/wk to 2 cans/wk since watching the super bowl. something they did must have worked... or i've just had a need for caffeine lately.

    also, the tiger google parody was pretty good: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcZ-arbR0EE
blog comments powered by Disqus